lordgalvar wrote:RNC has to side with him because they see their jobs on the line. They are just looking out for themselves or taking an opportunity (McCarthy and Nunes to look at some California reps...McCarthy is a known flip-flopper...he just wants press. He's Bill Thomas-lite).
While I agree, I also think it's pathetic that they value their jobs over what's right for our country. This is a prime example of why I believe the entire system needs to be dismantled and rebuilt with no two party system. Fuck the RNC and the DNC. They are both lying cunts who don't give a shit about us.
lordgalvar wrote:
It wasn't a witch hunt. It's just an investigation that got got speculated on to no end because a bunch of people that need attention and ad revenue needed constant content. If we still got the news once a day, it might not have seemed like such a drag.
The witch hunt comes mostly from the media and social media. I don't think there was ever truly one coming from internal investigations but the people of this country certain have been on one and I get it. However, I think it's been a ton of wasted time and energy.
lordgalvar wrote:
They found some bad people doing some bad stuff. The money spent isn't all that much compared to the other dumb stuff we spend on in the name of defense and bureaucracy (ships we will never use, failed military programs, subsidies to places like Saudi Arabia, the prison complex, etc). It brought to light a lot of questionable patterns and behaviors that Americans will have on their minds the next time they review candidates (at least for the next election).
I'll also concede that you are correct here as well but there are other things that need investigating like The Vatican. How about the FBI focus on that with their hundreds of years of rape and debauchery? I'm not saying this didn't need attention, I just think it received way too much and was an enormous waste of the FBI's time and energy.
lordgalvar wrote:
I think what it did was test the checks and balances of the three branch system and illustrate what shape it's in at the moment. We may not know the ramifications for a while, but the branches' autonomy was pulled into question and loose rules about procedures were defined and clarified.
I don't think anything would have happened to Trump. It would have been too disruptive and shown too much weakness internationally. I also think that anything that really would have been done with collusion or obstruction are really outside of Trump's, the individual's, intelligence. The people around him saw an opportunity to exploit and went for it. Russia saw an opportunity on both sides and went for it.
lordgalvar wrote:
To pin something directly on him would have been extremely difficult with just a few people's words as they made deals. I've always thought the one of the many real flaws in Trump, beyond being a hateful, rambling, attention-seeking jerk toward the public, is his malleability and willingness to surround himself with people that will do anything for a "win"*. I doubt he directly said something like, "go talk to my friend Putin so I can beat Hillary". I just can't believe he is that cunning to really pull off such a massive conspiracy over a theory like just a bunch of self-serving people got together with their own interests and blundered into something...some got caught, some didn't.
No one will know the true outcome of this for several years. I think Democrats are doing ok. They have some different sentiments coming out at different times probably blown up by the media that makes them seem more washy on stuff than they really are. I always just think they are going to g to do what it takes to get reelected which usually means "do nothing or at least get some money to fix that one freeway". Don't know. Constant coverage has really changed the way news and issues are viewed by the public.
* I'm talking politically. Financially, he is a crook like most rich white guys in this country...but we've kind of enabled that behavior as a country. They aren't cheating on taxes, labor, whatever, they are winning and practicing good business by finding ways around the law. See: New England Patriots, very few prosecutions from 2007 bank failures, Wells Fargo, etc
Last bit here.

I don't think anything will ever happen to Trump even after his term, which I truly believe he will win again.
Hilary uses dirty tactics too and I think she's a disgusting human being. Look at what the DNC did to Bernie. Just kicked him to the curb since she has all the super delegates in her pocket/on her payroll. We all know it's true. She's just as evil as Trump and if they had been able to get past their own egos, they probably would have been a powerhouse team together. I'm purely speculating obviously. I don't want to make this about the Clintons either, just stating I hate them all. haha.
Here's the thing about the financial part. I don't see bending legal loop holes as being a crook exactly but a lot of the loop holes are morally wrong IMO. To me, it's the IRS fault for all of that. I think the IRS should also be bye bye though. I'm sick of paying taxes and want to go the Robinhood method.
I'm not trying to stir people up here btw. Just conversing.
I'm not in an outrage over Russia hacking our stuff because I don't know what I can even do about it. They've been spying on us for half a century, I mean, what are we going to do to stop them? I agree it's fucked up though. I just don't see a solution. It's like fucking people who steal credit card info. You can't stop the bastards and there isn't any technology anyone is using to prevent that either. So, how do we make our stuff more secure? That's a question that I just have no clue how to answer.