BoatRich wrote:it's hard to write oppressively heavy music without oppressive volume.
Meh. I go back and forth on that.
There is also the fact that a lot of bands get loud for the sake of being loud, rather than using it to enhance the music.
BoatRich wrote:it's hard to write oppressively heavy music without oppressive volume.
BoatRich wrote: As far as volume goes, I will literally never understand the need to play quietly. It just seems boring to me. Music should be felt as much as heard and it's hard to write oppressively heavy music without oppressive volume.
Iommic Pope wrote: Skip, you rule. You hate people so much, you're willing to discredit all human progress, its awesome.
Ancient Astronaught wrote:BoatRich wrote: As far as volume goes, I will literally never understand the need to play quietly. It just seems boring to me. Music should be felt as much as heard and it's hard to write oppressively heavy music without oppressive volume.
I think we do rather well as far as writing for not being able to turn up past 2-3 during practice. Writing the music IMO doesn't require volume, but its best used as an enhancing live tool. Some of the most oppressing and depressing music I've ever written was played out of a 1x12 SS marshall combo on 1 at 2am...
As far as live though, your damn right its gonna be felt as much as heard.
BoatRich wrote:I probably should have clarified that I meant live, because we do write some heavy shit, and I'm positive it'll just sound better the louder it gets.
Iommic Pope wrote: Skip, you rule. You hate people so much, you're willing to discredit all human progress, its awesome.
D.o.S. wrote:christianatl wrote:That EXACT thing happened to us in Boston. So fucked up that the band on tour is asked to provide shit for bands in their hometown. I understand if something breaks or if you plan on sharing cabs with another band you know / trust / are doing a few shows with. But we were straight up asked to borrow gear because the local opener said their bass cab took "four people to move." I wish I was making that up.
On the flip side, they did give me a copy of their vinyl for free. Possibly -- there were two openers and I missed both of them, so it could be the other one.
nightterrors wrote:Except fuzz, fuzz all the time.
LOCOPELAND wrote:Streaming the new Mastodon. So far "High Road" is the best song I've heard. This does not bode well.
conky wrote:I liked that song ok. But I've had to look at it sort of like do with Dillinger. They're two different bands.... one plays heavy shit like 43% burnt and the other plays great poppy songs like Setting Fire to Sleeping Giants and Black Bubblegum. In Mastodon's case though, one band plays amazing shit like Remission and Leviathan and the other plays really bad shit like The Hunter and Crack the Skye. I just choose to only listen to the good version of Mastodon.
van_muddlestein wrote:t-rey wrote:Jeebus, that is one sexy guitar.
I actually found someone else's mockup of almost exactly what I am planning on building.
Harry_Manback wrote:New Mastodon streaming on iTunes.
FFOM
wildebelor wrote:To be honest with you, I watched the crack the syke documentary when it came out and was really impressed by how much that album meant to the guys.
It was an eye opener for me and was very interesting (and good!) to see a band push themselves into different styles of music - and in my opinion, pull it off.
I think crack the skye is intricate, intelligent and well placed.
The Hunter didn't mean any where near as much and that's why it doesn't come across special.
If you can get your hands on that documentary, it's really a worth while watch!
Infinite Flux full sets and demo's on youtubeCorey Y wrote:it's not obsessive gear hoarding.
https://infiniteflux.bandcamp.com/whiskey_face wrote:that girl can fucking hit lemme tell you![]()
![]()