Re: Chase Bliss Thermae
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2018 4:52 pm
I might be willing to smuggle some into Canada for a small price. 

What volume of maple syrup and donair would you accept in exchange for a Thermae?Chankgeez wrote:I might be willing to smuggle some into Canada for a small price.
Chankgeez wrote:
This is true. Also as another ILFer said, there's added cost in keeping it analog, since the actual effect in question is fairly easily covered by/is not that revolutionary in digital pedals.Seance wrote:It definitely is.D.o.S. wrote:Because you think half a grand is a bunch of money to pay for a modulated delay?
Of course control is something that adds value.
Which is why rack delays from the days of yore still
fetch high prices. They offer levels and layers of
tweakability that a lot of pedals just don't.
I've been wondering about that--anything the Tonal Recall, plain or RKM, has that the Thermae doesn't? I haven't dug in to deep because I've only gotten to "really want" and not "must have" so far.Muse FTW wrote:Is it worth the $500? It's basically a Tonal Recall RKM + all of the pitch modulation options, and a really powerful Step mode. So I'd say yes.
I had the RKM and sold it when I got the Thermae. The RKM is easier to deal with, tone control and more precise control of delay time and mod, but for me the Thermae is IT. It's definitely not for everyone though.Gone Fission wrote:I've been wondering about that--anything the Tonal Recall, plain or RKM, has that the Thermae doesn't? I haven't dug in to deep because I've only gotten to "really want" and not "must have" so far.Muse FTW wrote:Is it worth the $500? It's basically a Tonal Recall RKM + all of the pitch modulation options, and a really powerful Step mode. So I'd say yes.
Somewhere Joel outlined the differences. But I can't find it anymore. Basically they're similar in that they both use the MN3005 chips but the modulation is handled differently, the two pedals are voiced slightly different and the tone control is very different. The Thermae has a slightly resonant low pass filter while the TR os a more standard high frequency roll off. Aside from the sequencing options on the Thermae, that low pass filter is genius and I hope it shows up on more delay pedals. It makes for super cool synthy sounding repeats.shikawkee wrote:I had the RKM and sold it when I got the Thermae. The RKM is easier to deal with, tone control and more precise control of delay time and mod, but for me the Thermae is IT. It's definitely not for everyone though.Gone Fission wrote:I've been wondering about that--anything the Tonal Recall, plain or RKM, has that the Thermae doesn't? I haven't dug in to deep because I've only gotten to "really want" and not "must have" so far.Muse FTW wrote:Is it worth the $500? It's basically a Tonal Recall RKM + all of the pitch modulation options, and a really powerful Step mode. So I'd say yes.
daedelus23 wrote:Somewhere Joel outlined the differences. But I can't find it anymore. Basically they're similar in that they both use the MN3005 chips but the modulation is handled differently, the two pedals are voiced slightly different and the tone control is very different. The Thermae has a slightly resonant low pass filter while the TR os a more standard high frequency roll off. Aside from the sequencing options on the Thermae, that low pass filter is genius and I hope it shows up on more delay pedals. It makes for super cool synthy sounding repeats.shikawkee wrote:I had the RKM and sold it when I got the Thermae. The RKM is easier to deal with, tone control and more precise control of delay time and mod, but for me the Thermae is IT. It's definitely not for everyone though.Gone Fission wrote:I've been wondering about that--anything the Tonal Recall, plain or RKM, has that the Thermae doesn't? I haven't dug in to deep because I've only gotten to "really want" and not "must have" so far.Muse FTW wrote:Is it worth the $500? It's basically a Tonal Recall RKM + all of the pitch modulation options, and a really powerful Step mode. So I'd say yes.
So, yeah. There's stuff you can do with one that the other can't do and vice versa.
EDIT: Found the post:
https://chaseblissaudio.com/2018/01/24/ ... al-recall/
Okay wow I feel like a dang idiot, I had it in my mind that the modulation settings would be like auto-turning the interval knobs, so switching Modulation on would kill the current sequence and you'd get a ramp through the different intervals. But of course it's standard delay modulation, that makes about 1000% more sense than what I thought, and explains why the sequence kept going when I switched Modulation on/why I thought it wasn't working right.shikawkee wrote:I wish I had taken pics of the modulation settings I came up with before saving the preset so I could share it with you but if you click the mod switch it is possible. It didn't take me super long as I remember. Got a really beautiful mod setting out of it.baremountain wrote: Curious how y'all are using Modulation mode though. I tried it and literally could not make heads or tails of what was happening, and turning the depth/speed knobs didn't really do anything meaningful? Anyone got an example setting I could use?