ilovefuzz.com

vidret wrote:

sylnau wrote:Why getting those when you can get 4 MT-2 for 88$ ?

I got one too, if DoS makes it in time.

Reason being I've been trying to find a fucking metal zone for under 50ish Euro where I live for almost 2 months, and now there's boneshakers for 40$? ez.

Believe me, if I could find a mt-2 for 22$ I'd buy it.

Ask the Boss guy.

DRodriguez wrote:Gonna load three into one enclosure the pedal controller for the tele terror. I was originally planning on building a high pass low pass filter for each of the three pickups, but this is cheaper and more versatile and gainy. One bone shaker for every 2 strings!

ritz wrote:

jrfox92 wrote:
I couldn't help myself and ordered one, too.

Me three.

Just one.

Same. Even convinced my non-ilf friend to get one.

jrfox92 wrote:

DRodriguez wrote:Gonna load three into one enclosure the pedal controller for the tele terror. I was originally planning on building a high pass low pass filter for each of the three pickups, but this is cheaper and more versatile and gainy. One bone shaker for every 2 strings!

Is this three parallel boneshakers going through a boneshaker?

I mean, it's not technically parallel, but it's close On the tele terror project, I have going has 3 diagonal pickups.



So I basically have isolated outputs for each pair of strings. I'm building a pedal that will have one multi-pin cable input, now a boneshaker per pickup, and a standard 1/4in output for separate FX chains.

Why? Because I was bored one day and morange gave me a free tele body that I butchered up.

will transform into a boner shaker.

That is bananas

DRodriguez wrote:I mean, it's not technically parallel, but it's close On the tele terror project, I have going has 3 diagonal pickups.



So I basically have isolated outputs for each pair of strings. I'm building a pedal that will have one multi-pin cable input, now a boneshaker per pickup, and a standard 1/4in output for separate FX chains.

Why? Because I was bored one day and morange gave me a free tele body that I butchered up.

This is seriously cool. You have a similar potential with hexaphonic pickups. A hexapedal setup sounds insane, though. I could easily wrap my head around a tripedal setup.

I might say though, the Boneshaker mostly works with high output pick ups, loses a lot with anything low gain.

You play licks on a guitar, and you can lick a banana. Therefore bananas = guitars.

As far as the Boneshaker, I'm mainly looking for the flexible eq settings on it. Plus, it's cheap, so I could afford to resell them if needed. My pickups are generally hot too.

I looked into hexaphonic pickups and other solutions, but nothing out there on the market fit my bill. And most had bulky attachments. Asked a few pickup builders, and none of the ones I asked wanted to build me 2 pole pickups at the quality of a 6 pole one. So I went with my solution.

Plus, it's more fun to DIY and solve a puzzle in my opinion. I'm not always the best at DIY stuff, so I enjoy a challenge I can rise to.

now that my your and you're is on the way, i kinda really want a positive now too.

Inconuucl wrote:I might say though, the Boneshaker mostly works with high output pick ups, loses a lot with anything low gain.

Can confirm. The Boneshaker is really cool. Love it for rhythm more than leads. Way less gain than people might think. Max gain is probably about the halfway point of an MT-2, which is the sweet spot (for me) anyway.

That feel when you've been dead set on a pedal for months, but go back and watch demos and come out underwhelmed, causing you to rethink your entire existence.

watch/listen once, buy once, make your own fun. that's what i live by.

waltdogg wrote:now that my your and you're is on the way, i kinda really want a positive now too.

Positive is fucking rad.