The BitQuest User Settings Thread

pedals fished from the shores of lake okanagan and flash frozen for freshness <drscientist.ca> <FB> <IG>

Moderator: Ryan

Post Reply
User avatar
Paul_C
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1813
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:45 pm
Location: Northampton UK

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by Paul_C »

my only "worry" is that I'll probably end up with two or three more of them . . .

;)
User avatar
terminalvertigo
committed
committed
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:28 am
Location: Ottawa ON

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by terminalvertigo »

I'm wearing you down.. :P
User avatar
Ryan
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5277
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:47 pm
Location: Ogopogo Valley
Contact:

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by Ryan »

Thanks for posting the cool settings, Paul and Adam, much appreciated dudes!

Question for you active BitQuest using people... do you think the BitQuest would be cooler if rather than having modulation for the patches, it had envelope control? There wouldn't be a way to do both and have control over both, you'd have to lose modulation with a rate control to gain an envelope with control... just spit-balling, this would take a lot of work, but do you think that would make the BQ more dynamic and interesting? Or just leave it?
User avatar
Clean Channel
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 771
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:03 am
Location: Canada

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by Clean Channel »

Personally, I for sure prefer as-is over a possible envelope design!
User avatar
Ryan
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5277
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:47 pm
Location: Ogopogo Valley
Contact:

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by Ryan »

Ok cool, thanks Tim! Maybe I'll do something envelope related that's a separate thing from the BQ and just let the BQ do its thing, just pondering...
User avatar
goosekevin
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 2236
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:25 pm
Location: NSW Australia

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by goosekevin »

i loooove the bitquest but i also love envelope control and the idea of more of that on the bitquet is very intriguing
Derelict78 wrote:That probably sounds awful in the best possible way.
User avatar
Ryan
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 5277
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:47 pm
Location: Ogopogo Valley
Contact:

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by Ryan »

Some patches might be even weirder with envelope, like pitch tracking or flanging or ring mod.. all of them maybe.

I should also mention that I don't have a great handle on envelope control with the Spin chip, it's not exactly perfect with the notch patch is it.. so lots to learn still, don't really know how to do the stuff I'm saying haha, but could be cool one day hey...
User avatar
blakestree
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2305
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:36 pm
Location: Savannah, GA USA

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by blakestree »

I would rather have the modulation.
While leaves shall fall, do branches intertwine, that we remain bound.

Blake's Tree
User avatar
ThorZ
committed
committed
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:19 am
Location: London UK

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by ThorZ »

Just build an envelope filter with built in tremolo, discovered this here (9:25 in):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3Rncf6pkZM[/youtube]
Im not back. Im just front
User avatar
ThorZ
committed
committed
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:19 am
Location: London UK

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by ThorZ »

Also this popped up on my ebay thread. I dont need another one but i want it!

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Dr-Scientist- ... 2518.l4276
Im not back. Im just front
User avatar
goroth
HERO
HERO
Posts: 13508
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
Contact:

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by goroth »

Ryan wrote:Ok cool, thanks Tim! Maybe I'll do something envelope related that's a separate thing from the BQ and just let the BQ do its thing, just pondering...

This, is a most excellent idea.

I really, really like envelope control, but I think the modulation on the BQ gives it so much character it would be a shame to lose it. The bit crusher/ sample rate reducer with slow modulation ... :drool:
Gone Fission wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:21 pm That’s quarter-assed at best.
Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
Tristan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3051
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:23 pm
Location: Harlem, The Netherlands

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by Tristan »

Ryan wrote:Thanks for posting the cool settings, Paul and Adam, much appreciated dudes!

Question for you active BitQuest using people... do you think the BitQuest would be cooler if rather than having modulation for the patches, it had envelope control? There wouldn't be a way to do both and have control over both, you'd have to lose modulation with a rate control to gain an envelope with control... just spit-balling, this would take a lot of work, but do you think that would make the BQ more dynamic and interesting? Or just leave it?


I'm not sure about the envelope but new patches for the BitQuest would be awesome I think. :)
So far I've mostly been using the reverb, filter and bit crusher, sometimes I also use the notch filter and the pitch shifter (all on the clean quest).
Different (clean or semi-clean) variations on the reverb, filter, bit crusher, notch filter and maybe the delay would be really awesome.
In my experience you need quite a lot of control to make an envelope work, which will limit the sound shaping controls so personally I wouldn't go for that option.
It's a crazy and fun pedal as is for sure. :D
good deals with: the_brow, phantasmagorovich, alexsga, DarkAxel, goroth, The Wood Wizard, Tendollarcat, vbps, monkeydancer, intothegroove, Brobee
User avatar
ThorZ
committed
committed
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:19 am
Location: London UK

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by ThorZ »

this pitchshifter setting really make me just squeal with awesomeness:

ImageBit Quest - Pitchshifter by ThorZ666, on Flickr
Im not back. Im just front
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42133
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by Chankgeez »

When I was borrowing a BitQuest, I think the pitch shift mode may've been my favorite. :!!!:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
resincum
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 3883
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:30 am
Location: el paso

Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread

Post by resincum »

fuck I spent like 10 minutes thinking something was fucked up with my quest cause it wouldn't modulate and was super quite with vol/mix maxed but that damn filter mode had me fooled!!



i am FASCISNAATED by the modulation on the bitcrush mode :love: i could listen to this thing sweep for years through multiple dimensions!! thank you so much ryan :hug:
i'm glad i can call you a friend. even if i'll never see you again
Image
Post Reply