
The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Moderator: Ryan
- Paul_C
- FAMOUS
- Posts: 1813
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 1:45 pm
- Location: Northampton UK
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
my only "worry" is that I'll probably end up with two or three more of them . . .


- terminalvertigo
- committed
- Posts: 362
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 12:28 am
- Location: Ottawa ON
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
I'm wearing you down.. :P
- Ryan
- IAMILFFAMOUS
- Posts: 5277
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Ogopogo Valley
- Contact:
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Thanks for posting the cool settings, Paul and Adam, much appreciated dudes!
Question for you active BitQuest using people... do you think the BitQuest would be cooler if rather than having modulation for the patches, it had envelope control? There wouldn't be a way to do both and have control over both, you'd have to lose modulation with a rate control to gain an envelope with control... just spit-balling, this would take a lot of work, but do you think that would make the BQ more dynamic and interesting? Or just leave it?
Question for you active BitQuest using people... do you think the BitQuest would be cooler if rather than having modulation for the patches, it had envelope control? There wouldn't be a way to do both and have control over both, you'd have to lose modulation with a rate control to gain an envelope with control... just spit-balling, this would take a lot of work, but do you think that would make the BQ more dynamic and interesting? Or just leave it?
- Clean Channel
- Supporter
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:03 am
- Location: Canada
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Personally, I for sure prefer as-is over a possible envelope design!
- Ryan
- IAMILFFAMOUS
- Posts: 5277
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Ogopogo Valley
- Contact:
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Ok cool, thanks Tim! Maybe I'll do something envelope related that's a separate thing from the BQ and just let the BQ do its thing, just pondering...
- goosekevin
- Supporter
- Posts: 2236
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 10:25 pm
- Location: NSW Australia
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
i loooove the bitquest but i also love envelope control and the idea of more of that on the bitquet is very intriguing
Derelict78 wrote:That probably sounds awful in the best possible way.
- Ryan
- IAMILFFAMOUS
- Posts: 5277
- Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Ogopogo Valley
- Contact:
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Some patches might be even weirder with envelope, like pitch tracking or flanging or ring mod.. all of them maybe.
I should also mention that I don't have a great handle on envelope control with the Spin chip, it's not exactly perfect with the notch patch is it.. so lots to learn still, don't really know how to do the stuff I'm saying haha, but could be cool one day hey...
I should also mention that I don't have a great handle on envelope control with the Spin chip, it's not exactly perfect with the notch patch is it.. so lots to learn still, don't really know how to do the stuff I'm saying haha, but could be cool one day hey...
- blakestree
- IAMILF
- Posts: 2305
- Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 3:36 pm
- Location: Savannah, GA USA
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
I would rather have the modulation.
While leaves shall fall, do branches intertwine, that we remain bound.
Blake's Tree
Blake's Tree
- ThorZ
- committed
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:19 am
- Location: London UK
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Just build an envelope filter with built in tremolo, discovered this here (9:25 in):
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3Rncf6pkZM[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3Rncf6pkZM[/youtube]
Im not back. Im just front
- ThorZ
- committed
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:19 am
- Location: London UK
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Also this popped up on my ebay thread. I dont need another one but i want it!
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Dr-Scientist- ... 2518.l4276
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Dr-Scientist- ... 2518.l4276
Im not back. Im just front
- goroth
- HERO
- Posts: 13508
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:50 am
- Location: Eurothrash: Frozen northern outpost.
- Contact:
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Ryan wrote:Ok cool, thanks Tim! Maybe I'll do something envelope related that's a separate thing from the BQ and just let the BQ do its thing, just pondering...
This, is a most excellent idea.
I really, really like envelope control, but I think the modulation on the BQ gives it so much character it would be a shame to lose it. The bit crusher/ sample rate reducer with slow modulation ...

Music out on all streaming services and bandcamp and what not.
Spotify /// Apple Music
My band /// Instagram ///Bandcamp ///
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 3051
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:23 pm
- Location: Harlem, The Netherlands
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
Ryan wrote:Thanks for posting the cool settings, Paul and Adam, much appreciated dudes!
Question for you active BitQuest using people... do you think the BitQuest would be cooler if rather than having modulation for the patches, it had envelope control? There wouldn't be a way to do both and have control over both, you'd have to lose modulation with a rate control to gain an envelope with control... just spit-balling, this would take a lot of work, but do you think that would make the BQ more dynamic and interesting? Or just leave it?
I'm not sure about the envelope but new patches for the BitQuest would be awesome I think.

So far I've mostly been using the reverb, filter and bit crusher, sometimes I also use the notch filter and the pitch shifter (all on the clean quest).
Different (clean or semi-clean) variations on the reverb, filter, bit crusher, notch filter and maybe the delay would be really awesome.
In my experience you need quite a lot of control to make an envelope work, which will limit the sound shaping controls so personally I wouldn't go for that option.
It's a crazy and fun pedal as is for sure.

good deals with: the_brow, phantasmagorovich, alexsga, DarkAxel, goroth, The Wood Wizard, Tendollarcat, vbps, monkeydancer, intothegroove, Brobee
- ThorZ
- committed
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 4:19 am
- Location: London UK
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
this pitchshifter setting really make me just squeal with awesomeness:
Bit Quest - Pitchshifter by ThorZ666, on Flickr

Im not back. Im just front
- Chankgeez
- IAMILFFAMOUS
- Posts: 42133
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
When I was borrowing a BitQuest, I think the pitch shift mode may've been my favorite. 

…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
- resincum
- Supporter
- Posts: 3883
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:30 am
- Location: el paso
Re: The BitQuest User Settings Thread
fuck I spent like 10 minutes thinking something was fucked up with my quest cause it wouldn't modulate and was super quite with vol/mix maxed but that damn filter mode had me fooled!!
i am FASCISNAATED by the modulation on the bitcrush mode
i could listen to this thing sweep for years through multiple dimensions!! thank you so much ryan 
i am FASCISNAATED by the modulation on the bitcrush mode


i'm glad i can call you a friend. even if i'll never see you again

