SPACERITUAL wrote:Thats a pretty biased argument. If the man doesnt want custody or contact, why the fuck should he have to pay? The woman is advised that hes against the pregnancy, so shes making a financially irresponsible decision to go through with it. And why the fuck is a man a deadbeat if he doesnt want anything to do with that mistake? There are so many arguments against becoming a parent when you arent 100% ready its not even funny. Also why is it the mans responsibility to HAVE SURGERY when all you have to do is take a fucking pill?
Oh and you dont think 350 a month is high? What golden ivory jewel-encrusted tower do you live in....Have you ever worked for a living???? Try coming home a 7am all beat up bruised and dead tired just to realize "oh yeah i dont get my paycheck this week because jesus said abortions are bad". Fuuuuuuck that shit. For referance, a years worth of child support payments could get you TWELVE MEGALITHS, or a custom shop bass vi and TWO DWARFCRAFT PEDALS, oooooor A MEATSMOKE AND A SQUIER TELE, ooor A PRS IF YOURE A DOUCHEBAG, ooooooooor, AN AVRI JAZZY, A TWIN REVERB, AND A TAFM, FUCK OVERDRIVE, AND YEAR 4545.
i mean like, if you really never ever want to deal with the possibility of having kids as a man, get snipped. birth control is a two way street, and if she's not taking the pill or using condoms then obviously she's being risky too. but it can't be all the woman's fault that she got pregnant, for obvious reasons.
sorry, i misused deadbeat. a deadbeat by definition is a parent who avoids paying child support. so he's not necessarily a deadbeat, but he is an irresponsible asshole.
dude, i said 350 wasn't exorbitant. it's not pennies, but you guys were making it out like people just sit at home and watch sitcoms on their child support money. raising a kid is fucking expensive. if you really never want to deal with the possibility of having a kid, get snipped. it costs about two months of child support too, so it's more 'financially responsible' than running around with a ticking time bombs in your balls. if a man knocks someone up there's no line of logic that supports him having absolutely no responsibility to the livelihood of that child because it's partially his. he doesn't have to house or actually help raise the child. he only has to pay. i don't think that's unfair at all. raising kids is hard work.